Post-Election Audits Required
Similar in concept to an independent audit of financial statements, post-election audits are a nonpartisan process that allows states to verify the accuracy and performance of voting equipment and vote counting machines. In effect, a post-election audit is a partial recount of results, checking random samples of paper ballots or records against the results produced by the voting system, to verify that the voting system accurately recorded and counted the votes. While the majority of states require some form of a post-election audit, not all states have such processes in place. Properly conducted, nonpartisan audits provide public confidence in election results and can also act as a safeguard against hacking and foreign interference. Note: In 2020 and 2021, partisan officials hired unqualified individuals to conduct improper ballot reviews in states like Arizona in an effort to undermine trust in state voting systems and election officials. These efforts, which compromised the integrity of both ballots and voting machines, should not be characterized as audits, as they were designed and undertaken for illegitimate purposes. See also our map on risk-limiting audits.
State requires some form of post-election audit
State does not require a post-election audit
Recommended citation:
Movement Advancement Project. “Post Election Audits Required.” https://www.mapresearch.org/democracy-maps/post_election_audits. Accessed [date of access].
key
- Indicates state law or policy
- Indicates local laws or policies and/or partial law
- Indicates no law or policy
- Enumeration not applicable
- State has law that only covers sexual orientationLaw covers sexual orientation
- State has law that covers sexual orientation and gender identityLaw covers sexual orientation and gender identity/expression
-
Law covers association
- Law prevents schools from adding LGBTQ protections
-
Law bans transgender students from using school facilities consistent with their gender identity
| State | Anti-bullying | Nondiscrimination | Year Passed |
| Citations | Citations | ||
| Alabama | |||
| Alaska | |||
| American Samoa | |||
| Arizona | |||
| Arkansas |
|
2011 | |
| California |
|
|
|
| Colorado |
|
|
|
| Connecticut |
|
|
2021 |
| Delaware | |||
| District of Columbia |
|
|
|
| Florida | |||
| Georgia | 2011 | ||
| Guam |
|
||
| Hawaii |
|
||
| Idaho | |||
| Illinois |
|
|
|
| Indiana | |||
| Iowa |
|
|
|
| Kansas | |||
| Kentucky | |||
| Louisiana | |||
| Maine |
|
|
|
| Maryland |
|
|
|
| Massachusetts |
|
|
|
| Michigan |
|
||
| Minnesota |
|
|
|
| Mississippi | |||
| Missouri | State does not have this law | State does not have this law | 2006 |
| Montana | |||
| Nebraska | |||
| Nevada |
|
|
|
| New Hampshire |
|
|
|
| New Jersey |
|
|
|
| New Mexico |
|
|
|
| New York |
|
|
|
| North Carolina |
|
||
| North Dakota | |||
| Northern Mariana Islands | |||
| Ohio | |||
| Oklahoma | |||
| Oregon |
|
|
|
| Pennsylvania | |||
| Puerto Rico |
|
||
| Rhode Island |
|
||
| South Carolina | |||
| South Dakota | State does not have this law | State does not have this law | 2012 |
| Tennessee | |||
| Texas | |||
| U.S. Virgin Islands |
|
||
| Utah | |||
| Vermont |
|
|
|
| Virginia |
|
||
| Washington |
|
|
|
| West Virginia |
|
||
| Wisconsin |
|
||
| Wyoming |

